So, I've been watching my good friend Oliver (@oliverbcampbell on Twitter) play Middle Earth: Shadow of War recently and it's brought to mind a pattern that I've seen in gamers as a whole. It's taken me a couple days to really mull this over, but I still want to articulate this and at least start the conversation. From what I've seen, gamers tend to fall into something of a 3-point Paradigm. All Triforce jokes aside, whether you're casual, pro, or any of the myriad qualifiers in between, when you get into gaming, you're likely to fall somewhere within this paradigm.
At the 3 points are the archetypes that I call Synergist, Synchronist, and Strategist.
Synchronists are the types of gamers that really manage to immerse themselves once they lay hands on the controller and start their chosen game. They form something of a direct 1-to-1 connection and can play as though they are immediately experiencing the scenarios built into the game. Even when you see someone lean with every turn their vehicle makes or flinch when their character takes a particularly brutal hit... That means they'd synced with the game to some degree. Playing shooters like Overwatch, a pure Synchronist can fine-tune their own reaction speed and accuracy to make seemingly lumbering characters like Zarya or Reinhardt into quick-draw terrors.
Synergists differ from Synchronists in that these types of gamers are more reactive, as opposed to being more reflexive. A pure Synergist is like a good improv partner. Their greatest strength is being able to take what's presented and play off of it, thereby interacting with the game they play from more of a "conversational" angle. Let's take free-flow combat games like WB's Arkham and Middle Earth titles, for example. Some gamers, like Oliver, adjust to the flow and systems and match their own reflexes and muscle memory to the games. In that instance, he could be counted as more of a Synchronist. I, on the other hand, take a bit of a broader view and play not as if I were Talion but rather as if I were in Talion's position. I leverage my observational vantage point to get the same results as my friend's reflexive playstyle.
The third vertex of this triangle is inhabited by folks that I like to call "Strategists." Strategists are the type of gamer that interact with their chosen title by digging into the built-in and external meta of the game. Their domain is collision detection, frame data, pluses or minuses on block/hit, etc. Those who are heavy Strategists generally have a wealth of experience under their thumbs/joysticks and, more often than not, come to capitalize on this knowledge to educate as well as excel. Commentators like "Tasty Steve" Scott (@Tasty_Steve) and David "UltraDavid" Graham (@ultradavid) are prime examples.
All gamers show traits from these three archetypes in the way they play. From the casual to the global competitor. While everyone falls within the bounds of this triangle, pros tend to characterize one or more of these archetypes to an extreme level.
At the end of the day, what does this all mean? Simple. We can all excel at and enjoy gaming not just for what gaming is... but for what WE as gamers are and what we each bring to the table. Or Triforce. However you want to put it. Just some food for thought for you. On that note, Work Hard, Game Harder and as always:
Stay Good, Neighborhood.
At the 3 points are the archetypes that I call Synergist, Synchronist, and Strategist.
Synchronists are the types of gamers that really manage to immerse themselves once they lay hands on the controller and start their chosen game. They form something of a direct 1-to-1 connection and can play as though they are immediately experiencing the scenarios built into the game. Even when you see someone lean with every turn their vehicle makes or flinch when their character takes a particularly brutal hit... That means they'd synced with the game to some degree. Playing shooters like Overwatch, a pure Synchronist can fine-tune their own reaction speed and accuracy to make seemingly lumbering characters like Zarya or Reinhardt into quick-draw terrors.
Synergists differ from Synchronists in that these types of gamers are more reactive, as opposed to being more reflexive. A pure Synergist is like a good improv partner. Their greatest strength is being able to take what's presented and play off of it, thereby interacting with the game they play from more of a "conversational" angle. Let's take free-flow combat games like WB's Arkham and Middle Earth titles, for example. Some gamers, like Oliver, adjust to the flow and systems and match their own reflexes and muscle memory to the games. In that instance, he could be counted as more of a Synchronist. I, on the other hand, take a bit of a broader view and play not as if I were Talion but rather as if I were in Talion's position. I leverage my observational vantage point to get the same results as my friend's reflexive playstyle.
The third vertex of this triangle is inhabited by folks that I like to call "Strategists." Strategists are the type of gamer that interact with their chosen title by digging into the built-in and external meta of the game. Their domain is collision detection, frame data, pluses or minuses on block/hit, etc. Those who are heavy Strategists generally have a wealth of experience under their thumbs/joysticks and, more often than not, come to capitalize on this knowledge to educate as well as excel. Commentators like "Tasty Steve" Scott (@Tasty_Steve) and David "UltraDavid" Graham (@ultradavid) are prime examples.
All gamers show traits from these three archetypes in the way they play. From the casual to the global competitor. While everyone falls within the bounds of this triangle, pros tend to characterize one or more of these archetypes to an extreme level.
At the end of the day, what does this all mean? Simple. We can all excel at and enjoy gaming not just for what gaming is... but for what WE as gamers are and what we each bring to the table. Or Triforce. However you want to put it. Just some food for thought for you. On that note, Work Hard, Game Harder and as always:
Stay Good, Neighborhood.
***Ace's Note: Originally written and posted on 12 October, 2017)